Which of the following is likely to result from debates during an election cycle?

Debates during an election cycle are designed to provide a platform for candidates to present their views, policies, and arguments directly to the electorate. As candidates discuss their positions on key issues, voters gain insights into their differences, strengths, and weaknesses. This direct engagement typically leads to increased awareness among the electorate about where candidates stand on various matters, influencing voting decisions.

Moreover, debates often stimulate discussions in the media and among the public, further amplifying the awareness of candidate positions. The visibility of candidates during these debates can help inform voters, allowing them to make more educated choices based on the positions articulated.

In contrast, uninformed voting decisions are likely a result of a lack of access to information rather than debates. A decrease in engagement on social media platforms is less likely, as debates often generate additional online discussions and interaction. Less interaction between candidates and voters contradicts the purpose of debates, which aim to foster engagement through direct communication. Thus, the increased awareness of candidate positions stands out as the most accurate consequence of debates during an election cycle.