In the context of elections, what do debates typically allow candidates to do?

Debates serve as a critical platform for candidates during elections, primarily allowing them to clarify their policies and directly counter any claims made by their opponents. This engagement is essential as it provides an opportunity for candidates to articulate their viewpoints clearly and respond to criticisms or misrepresentations. Through this interaction, candidates can effectively communicate their stance on various issues to the electorate, which helps voters make informed decisions.

The structure of debates typically fosters a competitive environment where candidates must think on their feet and defend their positions. By responding to questions and challenges from opponents, they can illustrate their understanding of complex issues and demonstrate their readiness for public office. This interactive format also provides viewers with insights into the candidates' priorities and values, enhancing transparency in the electoral process.

In contrast, other options like outlining financial strategies or engaging in unmoderated discussions are not the primary focus of debates. Candidates may touch on financial topics, but debates are less about detailed financial plans and more about overall governance philosophy. Additionally, while public speaking skills are integral to a candidate's performance, the purpose of debates extends beyond mere showcasing of those skills—it's about conveying substantive political positions and engaging with the electoral challenges presented by opponents.